There Was Some Agreement over the Bill


In his meetings with lawmakers, Biden stressed the political danger he and his party face if his platform fails congress. He often touts the potential benefits for American workers and families, and what opinion polls suggest is a strong national popularity of his spending and tax plans. He also listened to legislators` concerns about the size and scope of plans, and sometimes individual provisions. He lobbied for their support, but did not threaten to break off the talks. Interviewer: “Stay where you are on the infrastructure bill if they put it on the ground today – `Yes.`” Your caucus stays where you are? There was a couple who said they would vote for it. “No, I`m very confident in our numbers, and the reality is, look, we`re going to do both. They are both part of the president`s agenda. We make sure to arrest women who need child care, families who need child care and paid time off. People who need to tackle climate change, housing, immigration. These are all things that are 85% on the president`s agenda, and they are included in the Build Back Better Act. So we`re sitting at the table trying to deliver both things, and I think we`re going to do that.

And I`m so proud of our caucus because it stands up for people who feel like they haven`t been heard in this country for a very long time. The people who came out and voted for the president because of this program, the people who came and gave us the House, the White House and the Senate because of this program. And they want us to fight for this program. And that`s what we do. And at the end of the day, we deliver both. Thank you guys. “Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Spending battles, even when it comes to more mundane annual budget negotiations, are even harder to resolve. They are now always settled at the 11th hour or well beyond the deadline – as shown by 22 government shutdowns since 1980 – with each faction trying to use the fear of delays and closures to its advantage.

Biden and his team started the week with a clear goal. They hoped to persuade centrist Senators Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Joe Manchin III of West Virginia to support a framework agreement, including a maximum amount of new spending programs, for a comprehensive bill that Democrats are pushing through the expedited budget voting process and hope to pass by a simple majority. Serious negotiations have only really progressed in the last two weeks, according to congressional and White House advisers. The intense round of talks, which was supposed to close a hundred billion gap between warring Democratic factions, began in the past 48 hours as the party failed to meet the self-imposed deadline for a deal by President Nancy Pelosi. Many Americans, convinced by a pamphlet written by George Mason, rejected the new government. Mason was one of three delegates present on the last day of the convention who refused to sign the Constitution because there was no Bill of Rights. The longest was the most recent, a 35-day shutdown from late 2018 to early 2019, which took place when former President Donald J. Trump tried and failed to pay for his plan to build a wall on the border with Mexico.

But President Bill Clinton and President Barack Obama have both presided over two- to three-week shutdowns. On Thursday, hours before the midnight deadline, Congress approved a spending bill that extends federal funding until early December, and Biden signed it. The judiciary of the new government differed from the legislative and executive powers in one very important respect: the courts did not have the power to act themselves. Congress could pass laws and the president could issue executive orders, but the courts could not review these measures on their own initiative. The courts had to wait for a dispute – a “case or controversy” – to erupt between real people who had something to gain or lose from the outcome. And it turned out that the people whose rights were most vulnerable to state abuses had the least ability to prosecute. The rights that the framers sought to protect from government abuses were called “inalienable rights” in the Declaration of Independence. They were also called “natural” rights, and for James Madison, they were “the great rights of humanity.” Although it is widely accepted that we have the right to free speech because the First Amendment gives it to us, the original citizens of this country believed that as human beings, they had the right to freedom of speech, and they invented the First Amendment to protect them. The entire Bill of Rights was created to protect rights that original citizens believed to be inherently their own, including: The House passed a joint resolution with 17 amendments based on Madison`s proposal. The Senate amended the joint resolution in 12 amendments. A joint committee of the House of Representatives and the Senate settled the remaining disagreements in September. On October 2, 1789, President Washington sent copies of the 12 amendments passed by Congress to the states.

By December 15, 1791, three-quarters of the states had ratified 10 of them, now known as the Bill of Rights. Native Americans were completely outside the constitutional system, defined as a foreign people in their own country. .